Archive for October, 2016

WHAT AMERICA IS ALL ABOUT IN 2016; AMERICA IS IN DESPERATE NEED OF THE LAST RITES!

Monday, October 31st, 2016

Here is an interesting read; today I am reading, “Once the hope candidate, Obama in his final days faces a hopeless electorate”: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/once-the-hope-candidate-obama-in-his-final-days-faces-a-hopeless-electorate/ar-AAjCCGt?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

obama-and-family-2015

All Americans, can only think about what America would be like, if President Obama were followed by a President like Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders, with an impeccable record of being a compassionate liberal progressive, instead of the “moderate”, centrist Republican-Lite, war hawk, Sec. Hillary Clinton, with her huge “baggage”, versus “Totally Crazy” Donald Trump!

America’s 2016 election appears to be a close battle of self-destruction and desperation to be the first American lady President, “with baggage”; the voting will be appropriate lite!

Holy crap!

I never expected to see this in my lifetime. “Where have all the flowers gone?”

AN ANALYSIS OF THE AMERICAN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTON IN 2016, AS SEEN FROM THE EYES OF A LIBERAL PROGRESSIVE REGISTERED DEMOCRAT, AND WITHOUT ANY HALLELUIAHS!

Monday, October 31st, 2016

Here I have compiled my own analysis of the American 2016 Presidential Election; from the mind of a registered Democrat who is a Liberal Progressive, and substantiated by a few facts.

Hillary Clinton: 15,565,022 primary votes in a rigged primary election, and 2,205 elected delegates and 602 super delegates.

Bernie Sanders: 11,818,210 primary votes in a rigged primary election, and 1,846 elected delegates and 48 super delegates.

Bernie Sanders did not do too bad for a candidate who had the primary rigged against him, was not expected to be a serious contender, and an Independent who ran as a Democrat only because there were no other liberal progressive Democratic Party candidates who would, or would be allowed to, run against Sec. Hillary Clinton, herself an avowed “moderate”, centrist and not a liberal conservative. Sanders of course is a life long liberal progressive.

hillary-trump-debate-handshake

Hillary early established in the primary that it was her right to be President, because she lost in 2008 to a liberal progressive (and Black) Barrack Obama; not logical thinking really and politically, since those same voters who elected Obama instead of Hillary in 2008 have not really changed their mind.

Hillary’s problem is that though the primary election was rigged for her to win the primary, how in the world is she going to convince the 11,818,210 liberal progressives who voted against her in the 2016 primary, to vote for her in the general election in November? Note that most of these voters are the same voters who voted against Hillary in 2008 and voted for Obama; they haven’t changed their mind! And Super Delegates don’t mean a thing in November!

It should be noted that Bernie Sanders did not burn any bridges in his primary run, or his loss. Bernie also won his Democratic Party platform, in exchange for his endorsement and support of Hillary Clinton against Donald Trump; however, no one pays attention to party platforms (except liberal progressives), and Hillary Clinton is definitely not a liberal progressive. In the deal, Sanders did say that he could not influence his liberal progressive followers to vote for Hillary, and that was strictly for Hillary to do.

Usually, a President picks a Vice President somewhat different from himself or herself to attract the most voters in November; Hillary Clinton didn’t do that, she picked a duplicate of herself (Kaine), instead, and unfortunately, Hillary has the worse favorability record of any candidate in history (except fortunately, Donald Trump).

For Hillary to win in November, she must attract a huge number of Republicans to vote for her since she has alienated Democratic and Independent “liberal progressives”; and she has convinced former Republicans President George Herman Bush and Sec. Colin Powell to endorse and support her,

Personally, I think it is important to remember that in the Midterm election for Congress in 2014, the Democrats did not run on President Obama’s record nor allow President Obama to campaign for Congressional candidates; the result was that two thirds of all voters did not go to the polls at all, and did not vote; as consequence, the extremist Republicans and “Tea Baggers” won the Congress majority, I would assume from the circumstances that led the liberal progressive Democratic voters to refused to vote because they had no liberal conservative candidates, though that could be debatable.

Consequently, America has been saddled with the worse Congress in American history since 2014; and, without a liberal progressive candidate in the Presidential election, many liberal progressive voters will not vote in 2016. It is my belief, based on the prevous campaigns of the Presidential candidates, there will be a very small turnout in November that might even be a record low turnout for a Presidential election.

My personal advice would be for every voter to vote; there could easily be a very low vote count in 2016, and I personally expect a very close race like 2000 and 2004, when there were similar political circumstances.

That is my analysis of a very disappointing (for me), 2016, Presidential Election; alas, we will get the results in a very few more days and know the winner and loser!

WITHER HILLARY CLINTON GOEST?

Monday, October 31st, 2016

TODAY, I AM READING ABOUT THE AMERICAN 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION AND I AM WRITING IN CAPITAL LETTERS SO YOU CAN HEAR???

FOR GOD’S SAKE, HILLARY IS NOT AND HAS NEVER BEEN “LIBERAL PROGREESSIVE” DESPITE WHAT HILLARY CLINTON IMPLIES AND WHAT DONALD TRUMP SAYS; HILLARY IS TO THE RIGHT OF LIBERAL PROGRESSISVE, OPPOSES “LIBERAL PROGRESSIVE” AND INSTEAD HILLARY IS A SELF PROFESSEED “MODERATE”, CENTRIST “REPUBLICAN- LITE”, BY HER OWN ADMISSION! “You know, I get accused of being kind of moderate and center,” Clinton told the audience at a Women for Hillary event in Ohio. “I plead guilty.” “Clinton ‘pleads guilty’ to being a moderate”: http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/10/politics/hillary-clinton-democrat-progressive/

BERNIE AND HILLARY COMPARED THE ONE DIFFERENCE

FOR GOD’S SAKE, VOTERS, GET IT THROUGH YOUR HEAD, HILLARY CLINTON IS NOT “LIBERAL PROGRESSIVE”, SHE IS REPUBLICAN LITE AND SUPPORTED BARRY GOLDWATER FOR PRESIDENT! LOOK AT HER RECORD! “WHAT’S TRUE: Hillary Clinton supported Goldwater in the 1964 presidential election; Goldwater voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964”: http://www.snopes.com/goldwater-girl/

THEREFORE, IT IS PERFECTLY SAFE FOR GOOD REPUBLICANS TO VOTE FOR HILLARY CLINTON AND FOR DEMOCRATS ENAMORED WITH FEMININITY AND WILLING TO HAVE THE LESSER OF TWO EVILIS FOR THEIR PRESIDENT, TO VOTE FOR SEC. HILLARY CLINTON.

IF ONLY SOMEONE OTHER THAN BERNIE SANDERS AND I WOULD APPEAR RATIONAL, AMERICA MIGHT SURVIVE!

NOTE FOR AMERICANS, ON ELECTION DAY: “BEND OVER, PUT YOUR HEAD BETWEEN YOUR LEGS, AND KISS YOUR ASS GOOD-BYE!”

AMERICA’S GOOFY “KNEELING FOOTBALL PLAYER” NATIONAL DISASTER; A CHAUVINIST DELIGHT!

Sunday, October 30th, 2016

Today I received my copy of my hometown newspaper, the Decatur Tribune; and I read about the local scandal of the football players protesting the national anthem because of various segment of government persecuting minorities including police shooting unarmed Black males. Here is my letter.

Dear Editor: (Who I highly respect but differ with philosophically and politically, and who I consider a friend who often gets mad at me and throws a “tissy”, which makes me laugh and love him even more.)

This is an exception to your “print all letters to the editor”, because I prefer you decide whether or not to print it and besides it is too long to print; you would probably have to edit for size.

However, I needed to write this because it is about a very important issue for me, and I want to “chat” about it with Editor Oz and anyone else. That said, here is my message about the Millikin football team and the National Anthem hassle; I feel strongly about it.

As you know, I am a native of Decatur and earned a degree at Millikin University. I love Decatur, Millikin, and I love America and served in the U.S. Air Force (my ancestors fought in the American Revolution).

millikin-university-football

There is presently a national discussion going on about People (and in particular a single football player), who feels compelled to protest grossly unfair, often barbaric treatment resulting in death of some citizens, and particularly citizens other than Caucasians and/or other ethnic minorities, by segments of our American government; and these people feel very strongly that they must protest their American government, by not standing to show respect for the anthem of that same government responsible for gross mistreatment, including sometimes being shot to death, of racial or ethnic minorities.

Being lily-white myself, and Protestant, Middle-Class, I have to admit that my conscience however, coincides with that of the minorities, whom I have seen gruesomely misrepresented and mistreated my entire life, of 86 years, by segments of my America’s government all over America, including Decatur and Millikin; and many of these minorities were dear and respected friends of mine.

Now I greatly admire pacifists, though I am not one; I served in the U.S. military and was trained to be a professional killer, because it was necessary. But I approve of pacifist protest, protected by the Constitution of the United States of America.

So, I disagree with Cheryl Gatto who wrote to you, “The Anthem is a prayer. If you choose to exercise your right to protest . . . do it after the (football) game.”

Contrary to Ms. Gatto, I am a patriotic American, I served my nation and I vote; Ms. Gatto is a chauvinist American, she worships American without exception and displays her chauvinism by publically worshiping the National Anthem.

Personally, I am a little “d” democrat who believes in democracy instead of worshiping America or the national anthem; I believe in equality, fraternity, and liberty.

Commodore Stephen Decatur was famous for saying, “My America, right or wrong, it is still my America.” That is simply a truism; it doesn’t mean you have to approve of what America has done wrong, or approve of America’s wrongful wars, or approve of America’s persecution of minorities.

Both Ms. Gatto and I attend football games. A football game is not sacred, nor is it religious, nor is it a government function, nor is it a U.S. military exercise.

There is NO NECESSITY FOR PLAYING THE NATIONAL ANTHEM AT A FOOTBALL GAME OR A PICNIC; if the national anthem encourages the persecuted to protest and the protest is offensive to others, including White Supremacists I might add, then simply play the national anthem at a different time and instead play the team’s “fight song” instead. Definitely, I disapprove of prohibition of legitimate protest because some people disapprove of protest or of the reason for the protest.

America had an era of Civil Rights protests; I was a part of it and it did not resolve the problem.

Today, America is undergoing a disastrous Presidential election and political upheaval; much of the cause is related to racial, gender, and cultural upheaval. It is scary and I can’t do a thing about it. Unfortunately, my America is not beautiful to me today. “Where have all the flowers gone?”

This is simply my difference of opinion with your editorial op, which I felt compelled to express. No offense intended.

A TREATISE ON TODAY’S AMERICAN GOVERNMENT AND SOCIETY; THE GOOD, BAD, AND UGLY!

Friday, October 21st, 2016

Today, I’m reading about the Presidential election and the apparent, current American rejection of democracy, equality, fraternity, and liberty, in exchange for the worship of “Capitalism American Style”, a preverted concept of simple capitalism, where a man is allowed to profit from his own ingenuity and creativeness.

The American “style of capitalism” has nothing to do with a person simply profiting from his own ingenuity and creativeness, which is a more traditional concept of “capitalism”.

Instead, the American version of “capitalism” is to screw the consumer, which is “everyman”, totally eliminate all competition, form corporations and corporate conglomerates to obliterate all competition. This is strictly an American invention and concept (and I purport to be a bad concept).

Further, the American concept of “capitalism” is to develop the cheapest possible product or service, and eliminate all competition providing “quality” products or services. This is in difference to foreign concepts of capitalism, which is to develop “high quality” products and compete with competitors selling “cheap” and inferior products.

CONSTITUTION CONVENION W 1787

There is a great difference in comparing American capitalism with capitalistic endeavor in other societies.

America is a rather isolated society geographically, though wealthy based on availability of natural resources and quality of its social and economic development.

However, America has in recent years, developed in a bubble; the rise of wealth and corporate conglomerates since the days of a social and economic democracy of Teddy Roosevelt, Franklin Roosevelt, and the decline of social benefits and rise of the power of wealth espoused by Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon, and the elimination of governmental regulation of the economy.

American has changed, and a prime factor in America’s becoming a plutocratic oligarch has been the absolute control of all news and information by the prime time American news media, which is owned, operated, controlled, and edited (censored) by its corporate owners; the wealthy corporate conglomerate owners of all of the news media are few, and are not dependent upon their customers for profits, so they do not serve their customers. Instead the News Media mammoths serve their advertisers. The profits of the corporate conglomerate owner of basically all of America’s news media, newspapers and television, are derived from the news media’s corporate America advertising; America’s news media owes allegiance only to their corporate advertisers.

American twenty dollar, Andrew Jackson

American twenty dollar, Andrew Jackson

Therefore, the only news that the American public get is the news that Corporate America want them to get; this can be easily verified if a person evaluates the news they get. The news is obviously biased!

And there is more. When the U.S. Constitution was written, the only news media was local village newspapers; the invention of the printing press was relatively new. Every village newspaper was owned by one man, who was in the business of writing the news, printing the news, and selling the news to local customers who wanted to be informed.

If and when there is competition in the ordinary news business, the newspapers competed to see who was first with the news and who was most accurate and reliable with the news. This news still exists in other parts of the world, but not in America where a publisher profits not from the news, but instead from their advertising.

Today, there is very little competition in news media; the competition that exists is, who can acquire the most advertising, get a monopoly on the advertising, and who can get the most subscriptions that will attract the most business, of the advertisers.

The customers, the readers of newspapers and listeners of radio and television, are simply not a factor is reliability, honesty, truth, or integrity of the news; today’s national and world news is a propaganda device of Corporate America (and America’s “democratic” government that is dependent upon the money of corporate American donors, including the news media, to get elected, based more recently on the U.S. Supreme Court’s “Citizens United”)

Now, getting back to the “news media” when the Constitution was written, which was village newspapers, owned, operated, and distributed by one owner resident of the village; the writers of the Constitution wanted to protect owners of newspaper (the press) from political violence, in order to report the news truthfully and honestly, and they included in the First Amendment, the Free Speech Amendment, four words, “and of the Press”.

Most Americans believe accurately that the writers of the Constitution tried to provide out new nation with truth, and accuracy, in news reporting, and certainly not propaganda; if our Constitutional forefathers were with us today, they would be appalled at the Corporate American mains stream news media using freedom of the press to lie, cheat, and misrepresent the news, making the news media a propaganda machine to indoctrinate American People politically and in economically. American unfortunately have very little, “other choice for news”.

The American people are not ignorant; however, they can be rendered ignorant by the Corporate American news media who operates without any limits; a famous news reported once said, we reporters report the news honestly and accurately, however, our reporting is edited and an entirely different version is published.

In 2010, when the five extremist, Republican appointed U.S. Supreme Court justices, made all of our laws that were passed by bipartisan Congressmen, limiting the amount of money any source could contribute to a political cause to be unconstitutional, they opened the floodgates for wealthy Americans to “buy” elections and destroy our democratic government and replace it with a plutocratic oligarchy (government by a few wealthy, elite citizens).

Beginning in 2010, the wealthy Corporate Conglomerates have been able to “buy” political candidates, and elections; first, the wealthy bought municipal and State politicians, and the State politicians Gerrymandered the Congressional district of their State, which resulted in minorities taking control of Congress, which had made new record lows in legislative efforts to provide for the People and have actually once, “shut down American Federal Government” at great cost to the People.

America’s current 2016 Presidential primary elections, chose 2 final candidates with record low popularity ratings by the People; America’s Presidential candidates have record low popularity ratings by the citizens. The purpose of this treatise of mine, is my effort to explain some reasons why?

Let me explain and I assure you that I am not a renowned expert in anything; I am an overeducated retired school teacher, who had the experience of living in Europe for five years (2000-2005) and seeing America from the outside looking in. What I saw alarmed me.

From my vantage point in Europe, I experienced entirely different world news that the rest of the world was getting, compared to distorted and bias news I saw by electronic technology that Americans were getting from their Corporate American news media; Americans were being indoctrinated by corporate American propaganda “for the benefit of Corporate America”. Often, the European TV news casters would show videos related to the American wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, with a disclaimer that “These videos will not be shown on American TV”!

Attitudes in Europe about Americans and America changed very quickly after the corrupted Florida Presidential elections in 2000 and heinous bin Laden attack in 2001 and the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq; the attitude of Europeans toward Americans, like me, also changed drastically.

Europeans were disappointed that Americans did not start a revolution over the 2000 corrupted Florida election and could not understand why the American People did not revolt; and as a teacher, I was fascinated by the fact the Europeans were more knowledgeable about America’s Electoral College for choosing a President, than Americans are.

Then, Europeans were exceedingly compassionate toward Americans when the terrorist bin Laden attaced on 9/11; they collected and offered aid to America and were disappointed when their aid was turned down.

In 2001, the Europeans did not understand the American invasion and bombing of Afghanistan, who had nothing to do with the Saudi Arabian terrorist bin Laden’s heinous attack on 9/11. Afghanistan was still devastated by Russian occupation. And European TV was filled with videos of more than one hundred thousand of innocent Afghan children, mothers, and fathers being killed and maimed by American “Carpet Bombing” of Afghanistan, where there were no military targets; the TV announcers always gave a disclaimer, “These videos will not be shown on American television”!

Then when America invaded Iraq in 2003, European nations opposed it and refused to join America’s invasion, except for Great Britain who had economic interests in Iraq’s oil.

This was about the time that the U.S. State Department advised Americans living in Europe like me, to not appear to be American, for self-protection, and I personally, felt the decline in popularity.

The United States State Department issued warning to those of us living abroad as I was, to not appear American in public, we were told not to wear “cowboy” boots in Europe and not to speak English loudly in crowded places.

And I was amazed at how differently American news media reported the news, from European news reports. For the first time in my life, I felt uncomfortable living or just being in Europe. And, I returned to American in 2005 with an entirely different view of America than most.

Personally since 2005, I have been severely castigated for my questioning of American News Media honesty and bias, political dishonesty, and illegal Constitutional behavior. However, during this 2016 Presidential Election, I’ve discovered that many other Americans are disillusioned, dissatisfied, questioning American news media, American political behavior, and the basic honesty of their own People’s government.

Today I felt compelled to write this treatise on my concept of America’s social, economic, and political society and government.

It is my opinion, based on my education and experience living outside of American and looking in from outside America. I insist on arriving at my own conclusions; and I believe that you should too.

Take this in with a grain of salt, and if this treatise is helpful in any way, it has accomplished its purpose. Enjoy a nice day, and vote on elections day. Only we the People can make a difference.

THERE ARE NO LIBERAL PROGRESSIVE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES IN AMERICA’S 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

Wednesday, October 19th, 2016

BERNIE AND HILLARY COMPARED THE ONE DIFFERENCE

hillary-trump-debate-handshake
HILLARY CLINTON VERSUS DONALD TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN 2016!

There are no liberal progressive Presidential candidates to vote for in America’s 2016 Presidential Elections. Pity!

Liberal progressive American voters have no viable choice!

HOLY CRAP, THE ELECTIONS IS VIRTUALLY OVER AND WHERE WERE THE GOOD DEMOCRATS, WHEN THE CRAP HIT THE FAN?

Tuesday, October 18th, 2016

In 2016, Americans and Democratic voters were driven to disaster by the Corporate American prime time news media propaganda that was totally effective.

Democratic voters in their ignorance have been led down the path of disaster.

Here is the problem for the Democrats. Hillary has the edge in the Presidential race over Trump, because he is so bad, Hillary was proven by emails “hacked” to “fix’ the primary and Wasserman-Schulz and others had to resign, Hillary is totally supported by Wall Street, and Hillary has the lowest popularity rating of any Presidential candidate in history and she IS the Presidential nominee.

HILLARY WINKING

And to quote, “For one, the so-called generic ballot — i.e., whether people prefer a generic Democrat for Congress or a generic Republican — still only favors Democrats by a small margin: 3 points in both the Post-ABC poll and NBC News-Wall Street Journal poll, among likely voters. That same Democratic edge on the generic ballot is actually down from 6 points in last week’s NBC-WSJ poll.

“Part of the reason Trump’s woes might not have filtered downballot could be that a strong majority of people don’t really associate Republicans with their party’s presidential nominee. And many people also appear to dislike Clinton enough that they like the idea of a Congress that could keep her in check.” http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/and-now-some-legitimately-good-news-for-republicans/ar-AAj2KQ3?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

Result, American disaster, Republican do-nothing Congress, untrustworthy President, and if Hillary is elected she will need her own WAR to rally the People to support her as President.

The American People are not ignorant, but they are kept ignorant by a Corporate America prime time news media that enjoys no opposition, total control of news, and the luxury of Constitutional “Freedom of the Press” that was written for a different time and a totally different news media.

Admittedly, I apparently stand alone in my interpretation of America’s 2016 disaster; but it is not really me, it is the lack of control of corporate America, lack of control of the distorted news media, America’s antiquated Constitutional provisions, and the power of the wealthy, derived from the U.S. Supreme Court’s “Citizens United” that will elect Hillary Clinton and Her Wall Street Backers to victory in 2016 and assure Bernie Sanders, American’s only hope, of TOTAL defeat.

Rest in Peace, American Democracy, God help the American People in the new United Corporations of America.

LET IT BE KNOWN IN ALL AMERICA AND THE WORLD, THAT I HAVE STUDIED ALL THE PRESIDENTIAL “PUSSY” ISSUES, VOTED EARLY IN THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, AND AM AWAITING NEWS OF THE WINNER, THOUGH I AM ALREADY AWARE OF THE LOSER, THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!

Monday, October 17th, 2016

Today however, I regretfully admit to reading, “Donald Trump Hates Alec Baldwin’s Portrayal Of Him On ‘SNL’”: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-baldwin-snl-tweet_us_58036193e4b0162c043c7692?

Ladies and Gentlemen of America; it is extremely difficult for me to address any question of propriety in regard to Presidential candidate Trump and the respectability of the United States of America, and America’s status as, a humane and respected nation on the planet earth.

presidential-seal1

Further, it is not possible for me as an “intelligent human being” to explain why Hillary Clinton and her campaign would accept the responsible for bringing up in a Presidential campaign, the rhetoric of Donald Trump’s private “locker room” recorded “man talk” about “grabbing pussy”, to the American electorate, making it a public Presidential issue!

This is unheard of, in historic American historical political rhetoric, as was former president Bill Clinton’s “assumedly” consensual, oral sex from an intern, which destroyed that intern’s social life forever in her lifetime and history; I did not approve of that means of charging President Clinton of “treason by virtue, or lack thereof, of accepting oral sex by an obliging young woman intern in the Oval Office.

America is certainly fortunate, that at least Presidential candidate Sec. Hillary Clinton has never had any sex, worthy of national debate, or any sex at all that the public has been made aware of; presumably, Hillary Clinton has limited her sex life, on at least to one occasion, for the conceiving of Chelsea, using the socially Christian acceptable “missionary style of sex”, totally approved by God and America, and not in the least worthy of national political cause or debate.

It is indeed fortunate for me that I have never had any kind, or amount. of sex that anyone else would possibly be interest in; of course, I feel fortunate in that respect, but there is also a little feeling that possibly something might be missing from my life, in comparison to those of Presidential stature.

Let the world be aware that two days ago, I received, I filled out, and I mailed my 2016 Presidential Election Ballot, I have unfortunately not engaged in sex for years, and I am totally through with the Presidential campaigns and the assorted national “pussy grabbing” oratory.

My vote is an American national secret and shall remain one, providing no one ever recorded any of my bedroom conversation and activity.

2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IS OVER FOR ME, I VOTER EARLY, YESTERDAY; ALL THAT AMERICA HAS TO DO IS WIPE UP THE BLOOD AND RESOLVE AMERICA’S “PUSSY” ISSUE!

Saturday, October 15th, 2016

Today I read, “Here’s a final outrage: Clinton told executives at Xerox that she wanted a “moderate” Democratic Party. Indeed, she wanted “two sensible, moderate, pragmatic political parties.” Wow. How crazy is that?” — Joe Klein http://time.com/4529399/why-the-russian-hacks-of-hillary-clintons-campaign-should-reassure-us-all/

hillary-trump-debate-handshake

“Sounds like Hillary already achieved her goal of creating “two ‘moderate’ political parties with the endorsement of Hillary by “moderate” President Papa Bush, whose controversial Desert Storm war, in 1991, for his oil and his business partner and friend, King Saud, in which Papa Bush defiled Saudi Arabian Muslim Holy Land by putting a military base there, which in turn was the incentive for terrorist Saudi Arabian bin Laden to launch his heinous terrorist attack on America 9/11, which prompted President W. Bush’s invasion of Afghanistan and Afghans in 2001, who had nothing to do with Saudi Arabian terrorist bin Laden, and then Sen. Hillary’s vote with other Republican Senators for President W. Bush’s Iraq Invasion Resolution in 2002, which approved of President W. Bush invading Iraq for oil and W. Bush had Saddam Husain assassinated, which created chaos in the Mideast and the rise of Isis. Actually, Hillary has created one big “moderate” war hawk Party, “The Republican Lite Democratic Party” that is totally financed by Wall Street and the military industrial complex.

The faux 2016 Presidential elections has deteriorated into a “pussy” controversy, of Republican “Pussy” grabbers and Democrats demanding a “Pussy” President.

Yesterday, I received my mail-in ballot, I voted, and I mailed the ballot, all in the same day. For me the 2016 election is over, the campaign recorded, and all that is left is announcement of the winner; we already know who the loser is, the loser is the People of America!

THIS IS A SHORT PIECE ABOUT AUTHORITARIAN POLICEMEN AND TEACHERS WHO PLAGUE AMERICAN SOCIETY, ACTUALLY KILLING, MISTREATING, AND MAIMING AMERICAN YOUTH

Friday, October 14th, 2016

I’m old and here is something I need to say and you need to know, if you don’t, that society has learned from comic strips, movies, and especially James Cagney movies of the past. Cops, Fuzz, or police have been portrayed as threatening or administering punishment instead of being of assistance to the innocent. Teachers were portrayed as dispensers of punishment rather than enlightening children and youth.

police-brutality-choke-hold

Unfortunately, the job of policeman attracts guys who like guns, always wanted to wear a gun, and had always dreamed of heroic shooting the “bad guys”. They considered their self, to be judge, jury, and executioner; and they considered their self the “good guys” but gave the impression to comic strip artists and movie makers, to be authoritarian dictators.

Mind you, I am not expressing my opinion of ALL policemen and ALL teachers, because I have been fortunate to personally know some policemen and teachers that I greatly respected and admired, compassionate human beings.

However, I have also always been a school teacher, and considered by many to be an authoritarian personality, and portrayed like parents, police, and “school teachers” are so often portrayed in comic strips and movies. I was thought to be imposing because I was big (6ft 4in). I know what I’m talking about!

teacher-spanking-student

Further, this is why I “sacrificed my life” to be a school teacher, because I did not believe schools should be authoritarian and dispensers of punishment; I never regretted my decision. Today, I am know by most of my students as an exception to other authoritarian teachers, of comics and movies, who punished kids for anything the teacher didn’t like what the students did, instead of teaching them how to do good things, in order to be respected in society.

Personally, I resent people who insist police or teachers are all good, compassionate public servants; they are not, some are wonderful and some are sadistic, racist and fascist. The Public needs to KNOW THAT, and make every effort to eliminate bad policemen and bad teachers.

In 1956, before I could get a license to teach school in California, I was required to sign a legal affidavit, under oath, that I had never been a member of the Communist Party or its affiliates; however, I could have been and was free to be a member of the KKK, the American Nazi Party, or a White Supremacist, all with government approval. Does this explain to all Americans, why comics and movies so often portray police and teachers to be authoritarian, sadistic, and cruel; many police and teachers unfortunately are?

Someone who likes guns and would love to be able to carry one, a person who dreams of being the hero who kills a bad guy, a person who believes minorities are inferior and/or evil, and a person who has a superiority complex and believes he or she is “angelic”, is not a good person to hire as a policeman OR a school teacher.

It is not because I am a bleeding-heart liberal, that I object to police killing unarmed Black men, instead of believing that all policemen are Sunday school teachers in their spare time. It is because I have personally know bad policemen and bad teachers who should never, ever have been policemen or teachers; and, I know that is why police and teachers are often portrayed as evil authoritarians in comic strips and movies of the past.

All that I am actually “for”, is having teachers and policemen be adequately screened to reject authoritarian, sadistic KKK members, American Nazis, extremist radical “Christians” who believe, “spare the rod (or the bullet) and spoil the children”, it’s wrong! Does that make me a threat to “your” society?

I am a teacher; I wrote this to teach society how to protect itself and its democracy from authoritarian policemen and teachers (and Presidents and Congress). God bless America.